Skip to content

Introduction to the Amazonian People Cosmovision

September 5, 2020

All human beings ask ourselves big questions about the origin of life, the universe, our environment. We ask ourselves about the meaning of our life and our relationships with society and nature.

What name to give to this network of questions about the essence of existence and the ways to answer them to the best of our ability?

Some call it thought, or “indigenous thought” (Esterman 2001) and others, worldview.

In this article we will call it indistinctly Amazonian worldview or indigenous thought, although we give preference to the term worldview.

The use of the notion of “thought” introduces us fully into psychology. Thinking is the ability of a person to plan and direct their behavior.

This process is carried out in a hidden way, since it occurs inside the mind, and cannot be observed sensorially.

That is, the thought is not observable, it precedes a conduct or behavior, and it depends on the individual experience.

Collective thought

Describing the “thought” of a group or collective, as it happens in a native Amazonian indigenous community, is equivalent to explaining the way in which that group responds to its great questions about the origin and purpose of the universe and of life, and the way how the individual, or the group of which he is a part, inserts himself into that perspective.

There is a risk, however, that we become entangled in the tenets of behavioral psychology. That would lead us to the prediction and control of behavior through experimentation, despite the fact that Skinner (1975) enunciated the concept of “free operant behavior”, which does not require a particular stimulus to be carried out, but only that the behavior originates, is maintained or modified, taking into account its consequences.

For many psychologists, behavior is the result of a chain of elements, which begin with beliefs, which are followed by words, these by actions, these by values, and these determine the destiny of a person.

The beliefs

Beliefs are systems of concepts and ideas, accepted in the society in which we live, that organize the perception we have about the world and about ourselves.

In these beliefs there are mythical components and non-mythical or rationalized components.

The important thing about a belief, for those who have it, is not that it is false or true, but that it is useful for their survival and gives them certain security in the uncertainty in which their life unfolds. In such a way that people cling to some beliefs, even in the face of evidence presented against them.

Beliefsdetermine a person’s behavior when faced with a given situation, and have a great influence on how one thinks, acts and how one behaves.

The other concept used to define the big questions about life and their answers is that of worldview.

This research will be developed in two parts. The first part will consist of the definition of the concept of worldview and its foundations.

In the second, I will describe, based on this theoretical concept, the forms of mediation used by these indigenous communities to relate to nature in a scenario where there is a generalized idea that all living beings, including human beings, are closely interrelated in a equality plan.

I will explain, then, the two most notable forms of mediation between human beings and nature: through the shamanand through the guardian deities or owners of natural resources.


The shaman and the “owners” or spirits of nature: mediators between two worlds

In the different Amazonian indigenous worldviews there is a general belief that all living beings (animals, plants, human beings) and spiritual beings are equal and share the faculty of being persons, subjects with a human soul, on a plane they call ‚Äúanother world‚ÄĚ, where the transforming beings live, although in ‚Äúthis world‚ÄĚ appear in their original appearance, that is, as animals and plants.

These two worlds or modes of existence, in which the relationships between nature and human beings take place, are mediated by two instances or elements.

One is the shaman, who has the ability to travel in the two worlds with the appearance of some animals, such as the jaguar.

For this mediation, he uses his knowledge and faculties, some hallucinogenic substances, generally yagé or ayahuasca, or coca, and sacred chants, ánent, amulets, as well as certain rituals.

The other mediation is through the lords or owners of nature, which are spiritual beings who are in charge of caring for the resources of the forest, water and land, applying certain rules that are mandatory for the people who carry out the different subsistence activities that are carried out in the context of the indigenous community.


  • Acosta L.E., Mendoza D. (2006). El conocimiento tradicional en la construcci√≥n del desarrollo sostenible en la Amazon√≠a colombiana. Revista Colombia Amaz√≥nica,
  • Andrade E. (2005). Las interrelaciones entre genotipo, fenotipo y medio ambiente. Una aproximaci√≥n semi√≥tica al debate Evoluci√≥n o Desarrollo. Revista colombiana de Filosof√≠a de la Ciencia. Vol. V )12-13), 109-142.
  • Arias-Guti√©rrez R.I., Herrera-Sorzano A., Gonz√°lez-Sousa R. (2016). Poblamiento ind√≠gena amaz√≥nico y desarrollo local en Pastaza, Ecuador. Revista Nov. Pobl. , Vol. 12 (23). La Habana, enero-junio.
  • Asp E., Ramchandran K, Tranel D. (2012). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, and the human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychology, Vol. 26 (4), Julio, 414-421.
  • Bargmann C. (2012). Beyond the connectios: How neuromodulators shape neural circuits. Wiley Periodicals.
  • Brammer de Rodr√≠guez M. (2015). La voz m√°gica. El an√©nt shuar como puente sonoro entre los mundos. Estudios Indiana 8, Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut.
  • Cartay R. (2016). The Peruvian Amazon table. Ingredients, corpus and symbols. Lima: niversidad San Mart√≠n de Porres.
  • Casta√Īo-Campos D.A. (1997). Adaptaci√≥n humana en el Amazonas colombiano: aprovechamiento de suelos desde la cosmovisi√≥n ind√≠gena. Adaptaci√≥n_Humana_en_ el_Amazonas_colombiano.
  • Chaumeil J.P. (1994). Los yagua. En: Santos-Granero F., Barclay F. (Eds.). Ethnographic Guide to the Upper Amazon. Vol. II, 264-274. Quito: IFEA/ FLACSO Ecuador.
  • Delgado-S√ļmar H.E. (1999). Cultura (Cosmovisi√≥n) y Salud entre los Bora. Ayacucho: SerieApuntes de Medicina Tradicional. No. 58. Lime.
  • Delgado-S√ļmar H.E. (1986). Cultura (Cosmovisi√≥n) y Salud Entre los Shuar. Ayacucho. Seris Apuntes de Medicina Tradicional. No. 59. Lime.
  • Descola P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of chicago Press.
  • Descola P. (1998). La selva culta. Simbolismo y praxis en la ecolog√≠a de los achuar. Quito: Abya Yala.
  • Descola P. (1997). Las cosmolog√≠as de los indios de la Amazon√≠a. Mundo Cient√≠fico, No. 175, enero, 60-65.
  • Derrida J. (2008). El animal que luego estoy si(gui)endo. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Derrida J. (1971). De la gramatolog√≠a. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
  • D√≠az J.L. (2008). La consciencia viviente. M√©xico: Fondo de Cultura Econ√≥mica..
  • Dilthey W. (1954). Obras. VIII. Los tipos de concepci√≥n del mundo. Mexico: FCE.
  • Duchesne-Winter J. (2017). Derrida y ell pensamiento amaz√≥nico (la bestia y el soberano/el jaguar y el cham√°n). Cuadernos de Literatura, Vol. XXI (41), January-June, 168-193. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogota.
  • Eliade M. (1991). Mitos, sue√Īos y s√≠mbolos. Madrid: Grupo Libro.
  • Esterman J. (2001). Historia de la Filosof√≠a. Tomo III. Curso Integral de Filosof√≠a desde Am√©rica Latina. Quito: Abya Yala.
  • Frankl V. (1973).Psicoan√°lisis y existencialismo. Madrid: FCE.
  • Fuentes C., B. (1997). Huaorani, huarani, cowidi: una aproximaci√≥n a la pol√≠tica multi√©tnica ecuatoriana. Quito: Abya Yala.
  • Fuster J.M. (2014). Cerebro y Libertad: Los demonios cerebrales de nuestra capacidad para elegir. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Goldman I. (2004). Cubeo Heh√©newa Religious Thought Metaphysics of a Nortwstern Amazonian People. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Goulard J.P. (2009). Between mortals and immortals. The self according to the Ticuna of the Amazon. Lima: CAAAP/ IFEA.
  • Hall J. (2011). Guyton and Hall. Textbook of Medical Physiology . Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier.
  • Hillix W., Rombaugh D. (2004). Animals Bodies, Human Minds, Ape, Dolphin, and Parrot Language Skills. New York: Kluber Academic, Plenum Publishers.
  • Kandel, E.R, Schwartz J.H., Jessel T.M. (2001). Principios de Neurociencia. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
  • Kapogiannis D., Barbery A.K. , Su M., Zanboni G., Krueger F., Grafman J. (2009). Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. PNAS. 106 (12), 4876-4881.
  • Kensinger K.M. (1998). Los cashinahua. En: Santos F., Barclay F. (Eds.). Gu√≠a Etnogr√°ica de la Allta Amazon√≠a. Vol. III, 1-124. Quito: IFEA/ Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
  • Kopenawa D., Albert B. (2010). La chute du ciel: paroles d¬īun chaman yanomami.Paris: Plon.
  • Krueger F., Barbery A.K., Grafman J. (2009).The media prefrontal cortex mediates social event knowledge. Trend. Cogn. Sci., 13 (3), 103-109.
  • Krueger F, Grafman J. (2013). The Neural Basis of Human Belief System. New Yok: Psychology Press.
  • L√≥pez-Austin A. (2012). El n√ļcleo de la cosmovisi√≥n y la tradici√≥n amaz√≥nica. En: Broda,J., B√°ez J. (eds). Cosmovisi√≥n, ritual e identidad de los pueblos ind√≠genas de M√©xico. M√©xico: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes/ Fondo de Cultura Econ√≥mica.
  • Macera P., Casanto E. (2011). Ash√°ninca magic cuisine. Lima: Universidad San Mart√≠n de Porres.
  • Mader E. (1999). Metamorfosis del poder. Persona, mito y visi√≥n en la sociedad de shuar y achuar(Ecuador y Per√ļ). Quito: Ediciones Abya Yala.
  • Mancuso S., Viola A. (2015). Brilliant Green. The Surprising History and Science of Plant Intelligence. Washington: Island Press.
  • Manligano-Antonio R. (2002). El mundo amaz√≥nico en su cultura ancestral. Lima: UNMSM.
  • Mazzoldi B. (2017). Derrida desde el Sur. La universidad del monte y el pensamiento sin claustro. Popay√°n: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
  • Melgar-Segovia A. (20 00). El pensamiento: una definici√≥n interconductual. Revista de investigaci√≥n en Psicolog√≠a, Vol. 3 (1), Julio.
  • Muramoto O. (2004.). The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in human religious activity. Med. Hypotheses, Vol. 64 (4), 479-485.
  • Nijhout H.F. (2004). Importancia del contexto en la gen√©tica. Investigaci√≥n y Ciencia, Agosto.
  • Ochoa, J. (2003). Myth and shamanism in the Amazon. Spain: Editorial Eunate.
  • Olortegui-S√°enz J. (2007). Racionalidad amaz√≥nica y racionalidad occidental. Th√©mata. Revista de Filosof√≠a. 39, 539-544. Universidad Nacional de la Amazon√≠a Peruana (UNAP).
  • Pa√≠s, El. Madrid, 27.10.2001.
  • Pati√Īo-Suaza, A.E., Sand√≠n-V√°squez M.(2014). Di√°logo y respeto: bases para la construcci√≥n de un sistema de salud intercultural para las comunidades ind√≠genas de Puerto Nari√Īo, Amazonas, Colombia. Salud Colectiva, Vol. 10 (3). Buenos Aires.
  • Plh√°kov√° A. (2010). Las etnias ind√≠genas del Ecuador. Olomouci: Universzita Palack√©ho.
  • Pueblos Originarios. (2017). Shuar. /2017/05/13/cultura shuar/historia-cosmogonia.html.
  • Radnikow G., Foldmeyer D. (2018). ‚ÄúLayer‚ÄĚ and cell type-specific modulation of excitatory neuronal activity in the neocortex. Front. Neuroanatom, 12 (1). Doi: 10.3389 (fnana.2018.00001.Consultado el 01.04.2020.
  • Reichel-Dolmatoff G. (1997). Cosmology as ecological analysis: a rainforest perspective, 7-20. In: Reichel-Domatoff G. Shamans of the rainforest: essays on the Tukano Indians of the northwestern Amazon . Great Britain: Themis Books.
  • Reichel-Dolmatoff G. (1975). The Shaman and the Jaguar. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Reichel-Dussan A. (1988). Patrones cognitivos. Bogot√°: Universidad de los Andes.
  • Restrepo A, R. (1998). Cosmovisi√≥n, pensamiento y cultura. Revista Universidad Eafit, julio-agosto-septiembre, 32-42.
  • Ridley M. (2004). Qu√© nos hace humanos. M√©xico: Taurus.
  • Rojas-Zalezzi E. (1994). Los ash√°ninka: un pueblo tras el bosque. Lima: PUCP.
  • Sanabria-Diago D.L. , Argueta-Villamar A. (2015).Cosmovisiones y naturalezas en tres culturas ind√≠genas de Colombia. Etnobiolog√≠a. Vol. 13 (2) 5-20.
  • Santos-Granero F. (2004). Los yanesha, 163-359. En: Santos F., Barclay F. (Eds.). Ethnographic Guide to the Upper Amazon. Vol. VIII. Quito: IFEA/ Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
  • Seitz-Lozada G.M. (2007). Ruptura generacional en las comunidades nativas away√ļn shushug, nayumpim y wawas durante las √ļltimas d√©cadas, 125-150. En: SEPIA. G√©nero y gesti√≥n de recursos naturales. Lima: SEPIA.
  • Shackt J.(2013). A People Stories in the Forest of Myth. The yukuna of Miritiparan√°. Oslo: Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturfurskning.
  • Skinner B.F. (1975). Sobre el conductismo. Barcelona: Fontanella.
  • Surrall√©s A. (2007). Los candoshi, 245-375. En: Santos F., Barclay F. (Eds.). Ethnographic Guide to the Upper Amazon. Vol. SAW. Lima:Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
  • Szab√≥ H.E. (2008). Diccionario de la Antropolog√≠a Boliviana. Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia: Pa√≠ses Bajos/ Aguarague.
  • Vacas-Moras V. (2008). Cuerpos, cad√°veres y comida: canibalismo, comensalidad, y organizaci√≥n social en la Amazon√≠a. Ant√≠poda. Revista de Antropolog√≠a y Arqueolog√≠a. No. 6, enero-junio, 271-292. Universidad de los Andes, Colombia.
  • Valverde F., De Carlos J., L√≥pez L. (2003). The cerebral cortex of mammals: diversity within unity. En: Schuez A., Miller R. (Ed.). Cortical Areas . Unity and Diversity. C.R.S. Press.
  • Van der Hammen M.C. (1991). El mmanejo del mundo. Naturaleza y sociedad entre los Yukuna de la Amazon√≠a colombiana. Utrecht, Netherlands: ISOR/RUC.
  • Vendejo-Garc√≠a A., Bechara A.,. 2010. Neurofisiolog√≠a de las funciones ejecutivas. Psicothema, Vol. 22 (2), 227-235. Universidad de Oviedo, Espa√Īa.
  • Viveiros de Castro E. (2013). The look of the Jaguar. Buenos Aires: Tinta Lim√≥n.
  • Viveiros de Castro E. (2003). Shamanism and sacrifice: an Amazonian commentary, 335-347. in: Chaumeil J.P., Pineda-Camacho R., Bouchard J.F. (eds.). Shamanism and sacrifice. Archaeological and enological perspectives on indigenous societies in South America. Bogot√°: French Institute of Andean Studies.
  • Viveiros de Castro E. (1996). Os pronomes cosmol√≥gicos e o perspectivismo amerindio. Mana. Estudos de Antropolog√≠a. Vol. 27 (28), 55-89.
  • Wagensberg J. (2000). Complexity versus Uncertainty: The question of Staying Alive. Biology and Philosophy, 15: 493-508.
  • Wright R. (2013). Mysteries of the Jaguar Shamans of the Nortwest Amazon. Lincoln-London: University of Nebraska Press.

This post is also available in: Espa√Īol (Spanish)